Free Hand Thinker

I enjoy listening to the Neal Boortz show. He may be insensitive, but he is honest and that's a lot more than you can say for some Liberals.

On his show one day, he had an army ranger, who was on leave from Iraq, call Neal's show and poured out his heart. I can't describe his testimony, but I have to be honest, I almost cried.

Have a listen

PS: There is a little advertisement from a website on the scream client. Let it play, sit tight and Vicks testimony is next.

"Islam vs. Islamists: Voices from the Muslim Center" highlights the work of moderate Muslims who oppose the Islamist agenda and are willing to speak out. PBS officials decided against airing the film, which PBS's Robert MacNeil told the Diane Rehm Show earlier this month was "one-sided" and "alarmist."

Full article

You read that right. PBS is too scared to show a documentary in which Muslims, who live in America, speak out against Islamic Fasicist that want to set up Islamic "side laws" in America.

To give you an example of this "side law", cab drivers in New York City are required to pick up anyone that wants a ride from the airport (can't be racists or w/e). Islamic cab drivers--and there are a lot of them--want a special law in place that will allow them to "decline service" to anyone carrying alcohol.

The best part of all this is PBC's statement of "one-sided." This is the same station that is about to broadcast a documentary by Bill Moyers saying that Conservative stars like Hannity, Limbaugh, and O'Rilley are slime. Is PBS showing a hint of Liberism?

I've said before that the Democrats--namely the Democratic congress that is in effect right now--are traitors. There is no way of getting around it, they are traitors to this country every time they undermine the authority of the President. Finding examples of this is everywhere. Just look at what surfaced today.

Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa. was being interviewed on a cable news show, when asked to respond to Bush saying that Congress "shouldn't be micromanaging the war" this is what he had to say:

That's our job. It's time for [Bush] to get a redeployment plan. If he doesn't do that, we're going to have the disaster he predicts. ... I think the surge has failed.

Let me put this as plainly as possible, NO IT ISN'T! According to Article II, section 2 of our constitution--remember that document Democrats--it says:

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States[.]

Are you starting to get it now? Not only are the Democrats blatantly disregarding the wishes of the Commander in Chief to fund the war, they also are disregarding the constitution. Who do these people think they are? I've already stated who I think they are.

Let's not forget though, the Democrats can stop all of this. Democrats have the power to defund the war. They can end it! But they won't. Why? Because defunding the troops, no matter how much you believe in the cause of ending this war, is bad 'PR'. The Democrats aren't a party of principle. They have no principles. The only reason they want to end this war is because there is a large number of people out there, that they think, are tired of this war--it can be argued they are tired of seeing us lose, which is all the liberal media will show them. The Democrats are doing this to buy votes, and outright denying funds to the armed forces might lose them some of those votes. Absolutely sickening.

There is a problem with education in this country. Our kids tests scores are among the lowest in the world. Kids are trapped in failing schools, with no way of getting out. Who do we have to thank for this? Well, better write two letters; one to the Democrats and one to the Teachers Unions. These two groups are the reason why kids are failing.

Democrats have pushed for schools not to hold and/or fail kids anymore. Forget about the fact that the kid doesn't understand any of the material that he is supposed to know before he passes to the next grade, if you hold him back, it will hurt his self-esteem.

Parents have been pushing for vouchers for their students. With these vouchers, the parents and the students can decide what school that their child will attend. Teachers Unions have fought this for years because this will cause competition between teachers. How is this bad? Competing teachers will weed out the bad teachers and you'll nothing but good teachers left, not to mention teachers will have to come up with more interesting and intuitive ways of teaching. Teachers Unions don't want competition because it will cause teachers to do their job. HOW HORRIBLE!

Let me help you out Mrs. Clinton. First of all, you said these vouchers are taxpayer dollars. What part of giving taxpayer money to taxpayers do you not like? Aren't you the person that is pushing for universal health care and welfare for those "less fortunate." If you are a person that stands behind her principles, you should have no problem with giving away that money.

Second, how about we make a list of schools that people can send their child too. As long as the school of jihad and white supremacy pass the state standard curriculum, they get on the list and the parents can do what they want!

That is part of the problem people. Democrats don't want you to make your on decisions. They want you to rely on them for your problems. And when the government is the only one that can solve all your problems, you are no longer free.

Let's get away from religion and get back to Liberals. Unlike Liberals who have no drive to look into or debate opposing view points, I read Liberal writers and papers to find out what these people think. I came across one author, Deborah White, at about.com that not only obscures the truth to point out conservative agendas that aren't there, she is blind to the fact that her own party has a much more clear agenda.

Here is a quote from her latest article at about.com:

After the panel discussion, I asked Dr. Korb if the whispers were true that in winter 2007-08, President Bush and Congressional Republicans plan to declare the "surge" a success and pull large numbers of U.S. troops out of Iraq... just in time to positively affect the 2008 presidential election.

His response? Absolutely! They may not declare success, but they will time withdrawal of some troops to impact the presidential race.

An amazing assumption, but is it just me or can she not see past her on Liberal agenda far enough to see her own party can be more easily accused of this?

The Democratic congress has be fighting tooth and nail with the President to get him to accept a bill with a pull out date for the troops. Why, I ask you, if the Democrats believe that it is their duty to bring troops home, do they put a date in for pull out in 2008?

WHY!?! Because if they do that, when the troops come home they can say, "We did that. We brought your sons and daughters home. Vote for me!" Bush hasn't said anything about an agenda to bring troops home in 2008 to buy votes--he hasn't said anything about bringing them home--, but the Democrats have, at least, said half of that statement.

Hillary and Barack have have blatantly changed their dialect when speaking to minor groups in order to buy their votes. Do you really think that they would not use something as huge as bringing troops home to their advantage? Give me a break...

I posted on what I think Christians think of homosexuals, but let's take a quick look at the other side. In the article GOD TO SAME-SEXERS: "HURRY UP!", the author brought up a very good point:

Gay activist John McKellar has stated: "The major media are all nonstop advertisements for the gay lifestyle, so how far are they prepared to go in denying free speech to Christians, Muslims, and Jews?

Schools and TV were once non-bias toward all subjects and showed all viewpoints. That is far from the case today. It's okay to push homosexual acceptance and push that evolutionism is a science--which its not. But say a prayer, read the Bible, or voice your believe in God and you are persecuted for your beliefs. Who do we have to thank? Political Correctness.

It's okay that somebody is offended by a prayer, but don't think of being offended by a public display of gay affection. Totally hypocritical to expect to be appeased when someone offends you, but when you offend someone, that person should quit hating and get over it.

Can you guess which political party pushed such a blatant, hypocritical agenda? Well let's just say its not the Republican or the Libertarian party.

On the last post I made, someone left me a comment (which I am flattered that he/she read my post) asking to get my views on an article someone had posted on yahoo. It's entitled "GOD TO SAME-SEXERS: "HURRY UP!""

I have to tell you, I honestly don't follow this guy's logic. He says that God supports the Gay Rights movement so that, I'm speculating here, Bible prophecies will be fulfilled and bring about the end of days told about in the book of Revelations.

After reading his article 3 or 4 times, I came to the realization, this guy seems scared of homosexuals. This is not uncommon. One of the most popular reasons for the anti-gay rights acts, I have heard, is that Christians--kind of lumping all God loving/fearing people into one category here--are afraid of what might happen if homosexuality were to become more public than it is. The main focus is on the children. What would a child think if they saw two men kissing in public or a billboard of two men holding hands. Its all about fear.

Let me put this as plainly as possible. Homosexuality is not a disease. Its not a virus that you might catch by drinking out of the same glass as a gay individual. It's brought about by choice--sorry my homo friends, there are some people out there that first dabble in it to pacify curiosity than realize they like it--or birth--sorry Christians, science has proven that homosexuality can be brought about by irregular chromosome counts.

Homosexuals are people as well. You would never think to make love to your partner in public, why would a homosexual? Homosexuals have as much integrity as heterosexuals.

Fear of gay individuals is just childish. There are plenty of really scary things out there: Islamic Fascism, universal health care, the department of education, Liberals, the list goes on. The gay agenda doesn't even show up on my list.

If you are scared for your children, try talking to them. Educated them on the difference and don't shun them feeling a certain way. It kills me, emotionally, when I hear of gay individuals being shunned by their parents for their life choices. That is just sad.